Payments System Board Annual Report – 1999 References
Bank for International Settlements, Payment Systems in Australia, Basel, June 1999
Bank for International Settlements, Reducing Foreign Exchange Settlement Risk: A Progress Report, Basel, July 1998 (the ‘Sweet Report’)
Bank for International Settlements, Settlement Risk in Foreign Exchange Transactions, Basel, March 1996 (the ‘Allsopp Report’)
Bullock, M. and L. Ellis (1998), ‘Some Features of the Australian Payments System’, Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, December 1998, pp. 1–9
Financial System Inquiry Final Report (1997), AGPS, Canberra
Flatraaker, D. and P. Robinson (1995), ‘Income, Costs and Pricing in the Payment System’, Norges Bank Economic Bulletin, 66, pp. 321–332
Humphrey, D. and A. Berger (1990), ‘Market Failure and Resource Use: Economic Incentives to use Different Payment Instruments’, in D. Humphrey (ed.), The US Payments System: Efficiency, Risk and the Role of the Federal Reserve, Kluwer, Boston, pp. 45–86
Humphrey, D., L. Pulley and J. Vesala (1996), ‘Cash, Paper and Electronic Payments: A Cross-country Analysis’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Part II, pp. 914–939
Humphrey, D., R. Keppler and F. Montes-Negret (1997), ‘Cost Recovery and Pricing of Payment Services: Theory, Methods and Experience’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1833
Humphrey, D., M. Kim and B. Vale (1997), ‘Realising the Gains from Electronic Payments: Costs, Pricing and Payment Choices’, Norges Bank Working Paper, Oslo
Laker, J.F. (1999), ‘The Role of the Payments System Board’, Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, July 1999, pp. 6–14
Reserve Bank of Australia, ‘The Role of Exchange Settlement Accounts’, Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, March 1999, pp. 13–18
Reserve Bank of Australia, Foreign Exchange Settlement Practices in Australia, Sydney, December 1997
Reserve Bank of Australia, Reducing Foreign Exchange Settlement Risk in Australia – A Progress Report, Sydney, September 1999
Wells, K. (1996), ‘Are checks overused?’, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 20, pp. 2–12