RDP 2011-01: Estimating Inflation Expectations with a Limited Number of Inflation-indexed Bonds Appendix A: Yields and Stochastic Discount Factors
March 2011
- Download the Paper 480KB
The results of this paper revolve around the idea that inflation expectations are an important determinant of the inflation yield. In this appendix we make clear the relationships between real, nominal and inflation yields, inflation expectations and inflation risk premia. We also link these quantities to standard asset pricing models, as discussed, for example, in Cochrane (2005).
A.1 Real Yields and the Real SDF
						Let  be the real SDF or pricing kernel, defined such that
 be the real SDF or pricing kernel, defined such that
					
						holds for any asset, where Pt,τ is the price of the asset at time t which
						has (a possibly random) pay-off xt+τ occurring at time
						t + τ. A zero-coupon inflation-indexed bond maturing
						at time t + τ is an asset that pays one real dollar,
						or equivalently one unit of consumption, for certain. That is, it is an asset
						with payoff xt+τ ≡ 1. If we
						define the (continuously compounded) gross real yield by  , that is, as the negative
						log of the inflation-indexed bond price, we can use Equation (A1) with xt+τ
						= 1 to write
, that is, as the negative
						log of the inflation-indexed bond price, we can use Equation (A1) with xt+τ
						= 1 to write
					
This defines the relationship between real yields and the continuous time real SDF.
A.2 Nominal Yields and the Nominal SDF
						A zero-coupon nominal bond maturing at time t + τ is an asset that pays one nominal dollar for certain.
						If we define Qt to be the price index, then the pay-off
						of this bond is given by xt+τ = Qt/Qt+τ
						units of consumption. For example, if the price level has risen by 10 per cent
						between t and t + τ, so that Qt+τ
						= 1.1 × Qt, then the nominal bond pays off only 1/1.1
						≈ 0.91 units of consumption. Taking xt+τ
						= Qt/Qt+τ in Equation (A1), we
						can relate the gross nominal yield  to the nominal bond price
 to the nominal bond price
						 and the continuous time real SDF by
 and the continuous time real SDF by
					
						Motivated by this result, we define the continuous time nominal SDF by  , so that
, so that
					
A.3 Inflation Yields and the Inflation SDF
The inflation yield is defined to be the difference in yield between a zero-coupon nominal bond and a zero-coupon inflation-indexed bond of the same maturity
						As in Beechey (2008), we define the continuous time inflation SDF,  , such that the pricing equation for inflation
						yields holds. That is, such that
, such that the pricing equation for inflation
						yields holds. That is, such that
					
						All formulations of  which ensure that Equations (A2), (A3) and (A4) are consistent with Equation (A5)
						are equivalent from the perspective of our model, since only inflation yields
						are seen by the model. One such formulation is to define the inflation SDF
						as
 which ensure that Equations (A2), (A3) and (A4) are consistent with Equation (A5)
						are equivalent from the perspective of our model, since only inflation yields
						are seen by the model. One such formulation is to define the inflation SDF
						as
					
We can then obtain Equation (A5) by substituting Equations (A2) and (A3) into Equation (A4) and using the definition of the inflation SDF given in Equation (A6).
In this case we have
						as desired. If one assumed that  and Qt+τ were uncorrelated, a simpler
						formulation would be to take
 and Qt+τ were uncorrelated, a simpler
						formulation would be to take  . Since
. Since  , in this case we would have
, in this case we would have
						 so that
 so that  and
 and  as desired.
 as desired.
					
A.4 Interpretation of Other SDFs in our Model
						We model  directly as
 directly as  ,
						where we take
,
						where we take  as the instantaneous inflation rate and
 as the instantaneous inflation rate and  as the market price of inflation
						risk. Although very flexible, this set-up means that in our model the relationship
						between different stochastic discount factors in the economy is not fixed.
 as the market price of inflation
						risk. Although very flexible, this set-up means that in our model the relationship
						between different stochastic discount factors in the economy is not fixed.
					
In models such as ours there are essentially three quantities of interest, any two of which determine the other: the real SDF, the nominal SDF and the inflation SDF. As we make assumptions about only one of these quantities we do not tie down the model completely. Note that we could make an additional assumption to tie down the model. Such an assumption would not affect the model-implied inflation yields or inflation forecasts however, which are the only data our model sees, and so in the context of our model would be arbitrary.
						Note that this situation of model ambiguity is not confined to models of inflation
						compensation such as ours. The extensive literature which fits affine term
						structure models to nominal yields contains a similar kind of ambiguity. Such
						models typically take the nominal SDF as driven by  where once again the real SDF and inflation process are not explicitly modelled,
						so that, similar to our case, the model is not completely tied down.
 where once again the real SDF and inflation process are not explicitly modelled,
						so that, similar to our case, the model is not completely tied down.
					
A.5 Inflation Expectations and the Inflation Risk Premium
						Finally, we link our inflation yield to inflation expectations and the inflation
						risk premium. The inflation risk premium arises because people who hold nominal
						bonds are exposed to inflation, which is uncertain, and so demand compensation
						for bearing this risk. If we set  and
 and  which are both assumed normal, and use the identity
 which are both assumed normal, and use the identity  where X is normally
						distributed and
 where X is normally
						distributed and  is variance, we can work from Equation (A4) to derive
 is variance, we can work from Equation (A4) to derive
					
The first term above is the expectations component of the inflation yield while the last two terms constitute the inflation risk premium (incorporating a ‘Jensen's’ or ‘convexity’ term).
 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							 
							